Teams › Am. East · Compare Binghamton with another team

Binghamton
Binghamton returns 77% of last season's minutes and rates #261 on offense and #357 on defense of 365 teams. 80% range: -16.3 to -1.4.
Why we have them here
Binghamton's preseason projection of -8.8 (No. 330 of 365) starts from the roster: its players' ratings, weighted by projected minutes, add up to a roll-up worth -5.9, about the -5.5 typical of teams ranked near it. Last season's rating (No. 357 at the end of 2025-26) adds -3.2, less than its neighbours' -2.1; the program's level two and three seasons back and the roster's experience and shape add +0.0. It returns 77% of last season's minutes, about the same as teams ranked near it (74%). The projection leans most on Jeremiah Quigley (+1.6), Jackson Benigni (+0.1) and Joul Karram (+0.0); the newcomer who matters most is Joul Karram, a transfer from Utah Valley, at +0.0. Its 80% range, -16.3 to -1.4, is about as wide as that of teams ranked near it.
Generated from the published projection's own terms, not written by hand. "Teams ranked near it" are the thirty nearest in the preseason order. Preseason projection frozen 2026-10-23; how the projection is built.
Roster
Returning 61% · Transfer 23% · Other newcomer 17%
| Rank | Player | Pos | Ht | D1 yrs | Group | From | MPG | Rating | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 692 | Jeremiah Quigley | G | 5-11 | 3 | Returning | Binghamton | 29 | +2.1 | +1.6 |
| 1542 | Jackson Benigni | G | 6-1 | 3 | Returning | Binghamton | 27 | +0.1 | +0.1 |
| 1652 | Joul Karram | C | 6-11 | 2 | Transfer | Utah Valley | 9 | +0.0 | +0.0 |
| 4374 | Evan Ashe | F | 6-3 | 3 | Other newcomer | 9 | -2.9 | -0.7 | |
| 4591 | Nevin Ibroci | G | 6-2 | 1 | Returning | Binghamton | 6 | -4.1 | -0.6 |
| 4592 | KiJan Robinson | G | 6-3 | 3 | Transfer | New Hampshire | 20 | -2.2 | -1.1 |
| 4637 | Jayden Lemond | F | 6-4 | 3 | Other newcomer | 12 | -3.0 | -0.9 | |
| 4702 | Dylan Godfrey | F | 6-8 | 2 | Transfer | UC Riverside | 10 | -3.4 | -0.9 |
| 4759 | Sayerr Senghore | F | 6-8 | 2 | Other newcomer | 12 | -3.2 | -1.0 | |
| 4822 | Jake Blackburn | G | 6-5 | 1 | Returning | Binghamton | 14 | -3.2 | -1.1 |
| 4853 | Bobby Montgomery Jr. | G | 6-5 | 1 | Transfer | UTEP | 6 | -4.8 | -0.8 |
| 5005 | Stephan Snagg | F | 6-8 | 2 | Returning | Binghamton | 17 | -3.4 | -1.4 |
| 5082 | Jayden Kelsey | G | 6-7 | 1 | Returning | Binghamton | 12 | -4.5 | -1.4 |
| 5249 | Ryan Richardson | G | 6-5 | 1 | Returning | Binghamton | 17 | -7.2 | -3.0 |
A player's rating is points per 100 possessions better than an average Division I player while he is on the floor. Contribution weights it by the share of a rotation slot he is projected to play, so a star on the bench and a role player who never sits both read right. Rank is among all 5,249 rated players. MPG is the projected share of a rotation slot times 40. "From" is last season's team. The bars are contribution, the player's rating times his projected share; their sum is the roll-up the projection starts from.
Schedule
| Date | Opponent | Proj. margin | Win prob. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon Nov 02 | at | -17.1 | 8% | ||
| Thu Nov 05 | at | -7.0 | 28% | ||
| Sun Nov 08 | vs | +7.4 | 73% | ||
| Sat Nov 14 | at | -12.3 | 16% | ||
| Wed Nov 18 | at | -3.5 | 39% | ||
| Sat Nov 21 | vs | +4.7 | 65% | ||
| Tue Nov 24 | at | -8.2 | 25% | ||
| Mon Nov 30 | at | -5.1 | 34% | ||
| Thu Dec 03 | at | -10.3 | 20% | ||
| Tue Dec 08 | at | +0.1 | 50% | ||
| Fri Dec 18 | at | -4.3 | 36% | ||
| Tue Dec 22 | at | -18.5 | 7% | ||
| Sat Jan 02 | vs | conf | -2.4 | 42% | |
| Sat Jan 09 | at | conf | -3.7 | 38% | |
| Thu Jan 14 | at | conf | -5.0 | 34% | |
| Mon Jan 18 | at | conf | -0.2 | 49% | |
| Thu Jan 21 | vs | conf | +1.8 | 56% | |
| Sat Jan 23 | vs | conf | +2.7 | 59% | |
| Thu Jan 28 | vs | conf | -3.2 | 40% | |
| Sat Jan 30 | at | conf | -3.1 | 40% | |
| Sat Feb 06 | vs | conf | +4.0 | 63% | |
| Thu Feb 11 | at | conf | -7.1 | 28% | |
| Sat Feb 13 | vs | conf | +0.3 | 51% | |
| Wed Feb 17 | vs | conf | +0.7 | 52% | |
| Sat Feb 20 | vs | conf | +2.1 | 57% | |
| Thu Feb 25 | at | conf | -2.4 | 42% | |
| Sat Feb 27 | at | conf | -2.0 | 43% | |
| Tue Mar 02 | at | conf | -6.5 | 30% |
Projected margin is from Binghamton's side, with home court where the game is not neutral (N). Games are the schedule as posted; tournaments and late additions appear as they are listed. Predictions are as of 2026-10-26 and reflect the roster as the model has it on that date.